Pierre Auger Observatory |
||||
On the vast plain known as the Pampa Amarilla (yellow prairie) in western Argentina, a new window on the Universe is taking shape. There, the Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory, designed to study the highest energy particles in the Universe is being completed and, at the same time, taking data. Already it is the largest cosmic ray detector ever built. It is designed particularly to study cosmic rays above 1019 eV. By detecting and studying these rare particles, the Auger Observatory is tackling the enigma of their origin and existence. The cosmic rays properties are measured by two independent detector systems, the Surface Detector (SD) and the Fluorescence Detector (FD). The combination of these two complementary techniques forms a powerful hybrid system. The Observatory is designed to study the extensive air showers (see link to cosmic rays) and, when completed, will consist of 1600 water-tanks spread over 3000 km2, roughly 30 times the area of Paris, viewed by fluorescence detectors. This vast area is needed to catch the rarest events as even at 1019 eV the rate is only about 1 per km2 per year while a decade higher the rate is at least a factor of 100 smaller! The plan of the final layout shown in figure 1. Each point indicates
the site of one of the water-tanks. The fluorescence detectors are positioned
on small hills at the each of the area covered with the tanks. At these
locations (Leones, Coihueco, Morados and Loma Amarilla) are four buildings
that house sophisticated photomultiplier cameras that collect fluorescence
light, produced after the excitation of atmospheric nitrogen by the shower
as it propagates through the atmosphere. |
||||
![]() |
Figure 1: The layout
of the Pierre Auger Observatory with 1600 water-tanks over-looked by 4 fluorescence
detectors. |
|||
The Observatory is unique in its use
of two methods to study the extensive air-showers simultaneously. An
outline of the principle of detection of showers, using this ‘hybrid’ approach, is shown
in figure 2. Slight differences in the detection times at different tank
positions help scientists determine the trajectory of the incoming cosmic
ray. The detection times are measured using GPS receivers located at each
water-tank. To the fluorescence detectors, a cosmic ray looks like a UV
light bulb rocketing through the atmosphere at the speed of light, with
an ever-increasing brightness that can reach up to four watts as the cascade
grows to its maximum size. The Auger Observatory's fluorescence detectors
are much more sensitive than the human eye and can "see" distant
air showers develop. Occasionally, a cascade will occur in a place where
two, or even three, fluorescence detectors can record it. This allows very
precise measurements of the direction the cosmic ray came from. |
||||
![]() |
Figure 2: The conceptual
design of the Pierre Auger Observatory. A fluorescence detector over looks
an array of water-Cherenkov detectors. |
|||
Each water-tank holds 12 tonnes of clear water and detects
the Cherenkov light produced by particles passing through the tanks using
three large photomultipliers. One of the tanks is shown in figure 3 where
the solar panels used to provide power, the GPS receiver and the antenna
used to send information to a central point can be clearly seen. |
||||
![]() |
Figure 3: One of
the water-tanks of the Pierre Auger Observatory. The solar panel, used to
power the electronics, and the communications mast can be seen. The mast
holds a radio antenna and a GPS receiver. In the background are the cordillera
of the Andes.
|
|||
It is important to check the accuracy of measurements of signals
size and arrival times in the water tanks. This is done using pairs of tanks
located close to each other. Such a pair is shown in figure 4 which shows
two of the tanks deployed during early studies with a prototype array. |
||||
![]() |
Figure 4: Two adjacent
tanks that are used to make accurate estimates of the measurement accuracy
of signal and times. These tanks were used in the prototype array and are
of slightly different design to the final style seen in figure 3.
In the background the fluorescence site at Los Leones can be seen some 10 km distant.
|
|||
The equipment housed in the fluorescence buildings (FD
Buildings) is quite complex and power is supplied by conventional methods.
Each building houses 6 telescopes designed to detect the fluorescence light
produced by the cosmic ray showers. Components of one telescope - a camera
and the associated mirrors and filter window are shown in figure 5. The
faint fluorescence light comes through a special filter which is designed
to shield out much of the background light from stars. It also acts as
a shield to prevent dust entering the clean room in which the sensitive
photomultiplier camera is located. The light is reflected from mirror of
11 m2 area onto the camera. |
||||
The very faint fluorescence emission can be related to the
number of particles in the shower, thus allowing the growth and decay of
the event to be monitored. However, this requires a sophisticated program
of atmospheric monitoring and a battery of instruments has been assembled
to do this. Some of the information obtained may be of use to atmospheric
scientists. The cameras are able to detect light from the most energetic
events even when they fall as far as 25 kilometres away. |
||||
Employing these two complementary observation methods provides
the Auger Observatory with high quality information about the types of particles
in the primary cosmic rays. Comparing results from the different types of
detectors also helps scientists reconcile the two sets of data and produce
the most accurate results about the energy of primary cosmic rays. The fluorescence
detectors are able to detect the total energy of an air shower, which is
approximately equal to the energy of the primary cosmic ray. Total cosmic
ray energy is more difficult to determine with the surface detectors, which
sample a small fraction of the energy of an air shower. Comparing data from
the two methods is similar to comparing the results of a political poll
and the results of an actual election, allowing scientists to better understand
data from both detection methods and work on increasing the accuracy of
both techniques. While the fluorescence detectors only work on clear, moonless
nights, the surface detectors are always operating regardless of atmospheric
conditions. |
||||
![]() |
Figure 5a: A view of the 3.5 m x 3.5 m spherical mirror (left) and the aperture/filter through which light is received The picture was taken during the prototype phase when two types of mirror were under test. |
|
||
![]() |
Figure 5b: One of the 24 cameras used to photograph the fluorescence light The camera mount can be seen in figure 5a. There are 440 photomultipliers in each camera. |
|
||
The Auger Observatory is in the final
stages of construction and has begun to collect data near Malargüe,
Argentina, a town in Mendoza Province that lies just east of the Andes
Mountains. A matching site will also be built in south-eastern Colorado,
providing nearly uniform coverage of the skies in the northern and southern
hemispheres. If cosmic rays are found to arrive from specific directions,
the Auger Observatories will be able to identify and study possible cosmic
ray sources all over the sky with equal sensitivity. If discrete sources
are not found, the full-sky coverage provided by the two sites will be
essential for determining whether cosmic ray arrival directions are characterized
by subtle large-scale patterns in the universe, or whether they are completely
arbitrary.
Some discussion of the latest measurements relating to these issues can be found at Astrophysics Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory. A sample of events from the Auger Observatory can be found at Public Event Explorer. The Auger project was first proposed by Jim Cronin and Alan Watson in 1991. Today more than 300 physicists from 90 Institutions around the world are involved in the work of the Observatory. The 17 participating countries shared the $50 million cost of construction, each providing a part of the construction costs. The current spokespersons are Giorgio Matthiae (Italy) and Paul Sommers (USA). Jim Cronin and Alan Watson are now spokesperson emeriti. |
||||